I used Windows Live
Movie Maker to create the movie on the periodic table. This was the first movie I have ever made,
and I was surprised how easy it was to put together using this program (even though watching yourself on film is always embarrassing). I used our DSL camera to record the video, uploaded
the individual video files onto Movie Maker, cut the sections I wanted, added
music and Movie Maker did it’s magic! I
think students would find this tool exceptionally easy to use. In fact, I think my 5 year old could create a
movie! As most students have a smart
phone / Ipod, they can use this to record the video file. A specialised video camera is not required,
so makes it more accessible to more students. In addition, I uploaded the video to Youtube, which was also a very straight-forward process (that I have not done before).
Here's my PMI analysis of video:
Here's my PMI analysis of video:
Plus
|
Minus
|
Interesting
/ Implications
|
Students
can re-record until they are happy with recording.
|
Can
be time consuming to edit and put together.
|
Can
be used instead of live oral presentations – good for students who are not
confident doing oral presentations.
|
Combines
images and sound – appeal to both visual and auditory learners.
|
Sound
can sometimes be an issue, depending on the quality of the microphone in the
phone/camera/video recording device.
|
Like
podcasts, YouTube (and other video sites) has changed education – you can watch
a video on virtually anything, including lectures from conferences and
universities in other countries.
|
Can
watch video whenever convenient
|
|
|
Easy
to record (most mobile phones and cameras have video function)
|
|
|
Can
embed directly into wiki and glog and blog
|
|
|
YouTube
– videos on practically anything (a lot of educational videos too).
|
|
|
Can
import PowerPoint slides into MovieMaker to create a video very easily.
|
|
|
I think the use of
video as a learning tool could be very relevant in the areas of Science and
Home Economics. As seen in my short
video, making Science real by creating a video on the periodic table elements
may make students more engaged with concepts that they cannot see. In an assessment piece, giving students a
limit on the video duration would also make them consider and assess the most
important components that needed to be included.
Creating a video requires high order thinking skills of designing, planning, producing, filming, mixing/editing as per Bloom's Digital Taxonomy. Even though the final video may only be a few minutes long, there is alot of work using high order thinking skills behind the scenes to get it to that point. If I made this video public on YouTube (currently it is unlisted so only those with the link can see it), it can contribute to the current resource pool of science in the real world. This opens it up to comments and debates from web users as to the accuracy and effectiveness of the video ... in essence, users of the web are marking/assessing my video! This creates dialogue, and encourages me to go back , review and update the video depending on the feedback and suggestions provided.
With the periodic table video, I included the words of the
elements with the pictures to assist students to make the connection between
the visual image and the name of the element.
This is in line with the spatial contiguity principle, whereby students
are thought to learn more effectively when corresponding words and images are
located near each other (Stansbury, 2008).
Similarly, students are thought to have enhanced learning when
corresponding words and images are located simultaneously according to the Temporal
Contiguity Principle (Stansbury, 2008).
In the case of this video, having the name of the element presented with
the visual picture of the real life application may be more effective than just
having the name of the elements presented at the end (and not connected to the
corresponding image).
Being a visual learner, I couldn’t agree with the Multimedia
Principle more: “Retention is improved through
words and pictures rather than through words alone.” (Stansbury, 2008). Bring on the pictures, I say. For me, it is true that a picture speaks a
thousand words. I think particularly for
subjects like Science where there is a whole new vocab and intangible concepts
(eg elements of the periodic table) for students to learn quickly, pictures
really do assist with retention.
I included some soft background music in the video because it
seemed very quiet (and a bit boring) with only my voice on the video. However, this background music may have
hindered learning, as according to the Coherence
Principle, students can learn better when unrelated and unnecessary sounds are
excluded rather than included (Swisher, 2007).
As with all online media, creating videos requires safe, ethical and legal guidelines to be adhered to. Students (and teachers if they are creating the video) need to ensure their video does not contain any abusive or explicit or illegal language, images or content, that they comply with copyright laws (particularly if they are using images, video and music incorporated in their video). All subjects in the video need to give consent to be filmed, so students must ensure this is done (and permission from parents/carers if children are being filmed).
Stansbury, Meris. (2008). Analysis: How multimedia can
improve learning. Retrieved 22 March
2013, from http://www.eschoolnews.com/2008/03/26/analysis-how-multimedia-can-improve-learning/
Swisher, David. (2007).
Does multimedia truly enhance
learning? Moving beyond the visual media
bandwagon towards instructional effectiveness. Paper presented at the
K-State at Salina Professional Day, Kanvas State University, Salina. http://www.academia.edu/1046356/Does_Multimedia_Truly_Enhance_Learning_Moving_Beyond_The_Visual_Media_Bandwagon_Toward_Instructional_Effectiveness
No comments:
Post a Comment